I believe that inflation is here to stay, rationale as follows.
Monetary policy:
-
The Fed is in a tough spot and is forced to keep
rates low. Despite a rational decision to weight ‘non-core’ inflation more
heavily, there will remain political/lobby pressure to continue easing in the
midst of the ongoing credit crisis. The deep pockets for which a bail out would
help are far more influential than voices calling for a wiser, long term
monetary policy.
-
The Fed can ‘afford’ to let inflation run a bit
because of the acceleration in the credit squeeze, and because food (15%
CPI)/energy is still a relatively small percentage of total American consumer
spend (not the case elsewhere). Increasing recession risk will force the Fed’s
hand, regardless of whether it is viewed that current recession fears are
inflation, credit or business cycle based
Tight commodity supplies are driven by record demand [from secular
shifts], despite record production:
-
Agriculture inventories remain low despite a record
15 year fair weather run and record yield improvements (better GMOs, technology, science) from
all producing countries except for Australia. For wheat, inventories
were so tight that 1% drop in supply lead to a doubling of price; once bad
weather hits or there's a crop failure, prices will skyrocket again
-
Mining consolidation demonstrates that its still
too costly (capital and time) to develop greenfield
projects! This is extremely bearish for supply growth and provides support for
sustained pricing
-
Backwardation assumes the world will be flooded
w/cheap supply of metal, not realistic if you look at demand vs greenfield/mine expansions
-
US Farm/Biofuel policy
promotes
Rising income = more and better food:
-
80% of the world population lives on less than
$3,000/year, incremental growth will be allocated to improved diet ahead of
everything else
-
Meat consumption still has a long way to reach parity
(kg/person/year):
o
NA: 125
o
Developed world: 85
o
LatAm: 62
o
China: 50
o
World: 40
o
Asia: 30
o
Africa: 17
Investor/management psychology:
-
Investment managers will increasingly view
commodity stocks as inflation hedges, driving multiples for miners/oil majors
(where previous capital appreciation was earnings driven). We will likely see
new money into the names (as volatility and inflation spike), and consolidation
has decreased the investable universe.
-
Inflation is a positive feedback loop, partially a
self-fulfilling prophecy. One example of this playing out is that a generation
of just-in-time managers (trumpeted in MBA programs since early ‘80s) will
realize the value of stockpiling, exacerbated existing demand pressures and
tying up working capital (which will actually represent an intelligent use of
cash in an appreciating asset) – the urge to hoard will be evident on balance
sheets (and positively in earnings, though not ‘clean’ earnings, ex. XOM in ’79
had 35% of earnings from inventory gains).
-
Most commodities futures charts remain in
backwardation, signaling investor and consumer doubt over high commodity
prices. As inflation fears increase, we will see curves move towards contango – resulting in rapid revaluation of commodity
equities (multiples and earnings estimates will rise)
o
FCX is the only mining major in the S&P and
Newmont the only gold miner
-
Evidence that the Street still doesn’t believe in
sustained metals/food prices – Inco/Fal, 2 of the 3
largest copper producers and public for ages, were sold to CVRD and Xstrata at
(in hindsight) absurdly low multiples; if the street believed in inflation,
they would’ve stayed public
Ways to play:
-
Primary beneficiaries will continue to be miners, ag stocks (fertilizer, equip and
seeds/chem), and limited oil/gas names.
-
Everything we’ve seen indicates that farmer
expenditures are proportionately tied to cash receipts, which are at record
highs and unlikely to fall precipitously.
-
Need to focus on miners w/unhedged
reserves rather than fixating on current earnings, otherwise may face same
issue as oil majors
-
BMO’s Basic Points indicates that we’ve seen a
phenomenal run in the past 5 years of these names, and the next 5 years may
turn out even better, albeit with increased volatility and uncertainty across
all securities